| Nombre | Análisis de las Implicaciones Sociales de la Asignación Económica de los Recursos Naturales |
|---|---|
| Código | MODULO-3 |
| Institución |
|
| Nº | Curso | Relevancia |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
44% |
| 2 |
|
44% |
| 3 |
|
44% |
| 4 |
|
35% |
| 5 |
|
35% |
| 6 |
|
35% |
| 7 |
|
35% |
| 8 |
|
35% |
| 9 |
|
35% |
| 10 |
|
35% |
| 11 |
|
35% |
| 12 |
|
35% |
| 13 |
|
35% |
| 14 |
|
35% |
| 15 |
|
35% |
| 16 |
|
35% |
| 17 |
|
35% |
| 18 |
|
35% |
| 19 |
|
35% |
| 20 |
|
35% |
| 21 |
|
35% |
| 22 |
|
32% |
| 23 |
|
32% |
| 24 |
|
32% |
| 25 |
|
32% |
| 26 |
|
32% |
| 27 |
|
32% |
| 28 |
|
32% |
| 29 |
|
32% |
| 30 |
|
32% |
| 31 |
|
32% |
| 32 |
|
32% |
| 33 |
|
32% |
| 34 |
|
32% |
| 35 |
|
32% |
| 36 |
|
32% |
| 37 |
|
32% |
| 38 |
|
32% |
| 39 |
|
32% |
| 40 |
|
32% |
| 41 |
|
32% |
| 42 |
|
32% |
| 43 |
|
32% |
| 44 |
|
32% |
| 45 |
|
32% |
| 46 |
|
31% |
| 47 |
|
31% |
| 48 |
|
31% |
| 49 |
|
31% |
| 50 |
|
31% |
| 51 |
|
31% |
| 52 |
|
31% |
| 53 |
|
31% |
| 54 |
|
31% |
| 55 |
|
31% |
| 56 |
|
31% |
| 57 |
|
31% |
| 58 |
|
31% |
| 59 |
|
31% |
| 60 |
|
31% |
| 61 |
|
30% |
| 62 |
|
30% |
| 63 |
|
30% |
| 64 |
|
30% |
| 65 |
|
30% |
Pablo Morales P.
Pilar Moraga Sariego
Javier Vergara Fisher
Abel Piñones C.
Rafael Vergara Gutiérrez
Rafael Plaza
Ezio Costa Cordella
Ana Uriarte R.
Jorge Aranda O.
Jorge Soto Winckler
Audrey Grez V.
Gissella López R.
Christian Moscoso Wallace
Manuel Paneque
Rodrigo Fuster G.
Veronica Kunze N.
Andrés Urzúa
Catalina Andrea Medel Lucas
Jorge Ossandón R.
Maria Paz Pulgar
Omar Vásquez Duque
Patricio Leyton Florez
Santiago Montt Oyarzún
Ximena Insunza C.
Angélica Marchant M.
Francisca Salazar S.
Salomé Freire R.
Esteban Arroyo B.
Loreto Sánchez G.
Claudia Villagran Muñoz
Amparo Sanhueza Rozzi
Ángela Francisca Faúndez Cáceres
Aracely Gómez A.
Camila Pérez B.
Felipe Suarez V.
Gerardo Soto M.
Marco Arratia S.
Miriam Hidalgo
Ninoska Valenzuela P.
Simón F. Saud
Stephanie Gibson C.
Vania Ríos S.
Vicente Arriagada S.
José Romero Reyes
Nancy Adriana Yañez Fuenzalida